The Essential Citizenship Competencies, Questions for any Occasiondocx
SPS Navigating Concentus Resources Placemat
SPS Concentus Inquiry Planning Placemat
Coach Self Assessment Rubric
Citizenship Inquiry Power 5 Coaching Menu
About the Power 5
Are you looking for a discursive strategy which encourages all voices to be heard in a respectful manner and inspires deeper thinking of a topic? Socratic Dialogue might be the perfect strategy.
The Ancient Greek philosopher, Socrates, is credited with developing a collective dialogue designed to search for deeper understanding through questioning. He refined a process which has been adapted for classroom use and targets content exploration, speaking and listening skills. A Socratic Circle is an academic discussion of an essential question for students to share ideas, present evidence and refine thinking through structured dialogue. A dialogue is different than debate because it encourages a collaborative journey to understanding rather than opposing sides trying to prove one another wrong.
Here’s a brief rundown of how it can look for your class:
Set up the room into two concentric circles
There will be an INNER and OUTER circle and each student will have the opportunity to participate in each.
The inner circle will discuss the prompt, exploring and making connections personally and globally to the content.
- Example Prompt: Which Ancient Civilization does Canada most resemble?
The outer circle will observe the conversation noting how it progresses
- Consider body language, equity of sharing, momentum, etc.
Steps to conducting a classroom Socratic Circle
- Divide the students and assign half to the inner circle and the rest to the outer circle
- Provide directions to the group including clarifying roles and expectations of quality contributions
- Review of content and prompt
- Socratic Discussion by the inner circle and the outer circle silently observes and may take notes (timed: I usually go with 10 mins to fit the structure of a class period)
- Monitor the conversation as an observer, intervene only if absolutely needed (in case of inappropriate comments or in cases of extreme silence, provide an additional prompt to spur conversation)
- Allow for observations by the outer circle while the inner circle reflects on feedback (each person shares one observation and it usually takes around 10 mins depending on the number of participants)
- The inner and outer circles change places and repeat the procedure
For more information consider reading Copeland’s Socratic Circles: Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking in Middle and High School
or watch one in action:
What are some potential errors that I can look for when completing this template or supporting others?
- VERBS: A common error in this section is to consider the verb at the lower levels of Bloom’s, Remember or Understand. This results in tasks and learning which may not be as rich and complex as required by the outcome.
- CONTENT: Attention should be paid in the section to notice ALL parts of the content. Tip: if the words “including” or “and” are present in a list, then the items are required. If the terms “such as” or “eg.” are used then the content is discretionary by the teacher.
- STUDENT NEEDS TO: Ensure that the main action in this statement is at the same level of Bloom’s as the outcome and that the context for this thinking is appropriate.
- BY… (DOING WHAT?): An example of an error for this section might be if there is additional content which is not present in the outcome or indicators. Another caution is the number of pieces in this portion, if there are too many parts, there is a risk that not all will be taught or practiced prior to summative assessment.
- ASSESSMENT TASK(S): Ensure that the task is robust to properly measure the outcome and is not a formative or practice piece of evidence.
- KEY SKILLS & KNOWLEDGE: This section might present a variety of errors, including: a list of items which don’t reach the required level of Bloom’s, inclusion of knowledge or skills which are different than the outcome, or too many items which indicates lack of prioritizing essential skills.
- PROFICIENT AT KEY SKILLS: Common errors may include: not clearly identifying degree to which the key skills should be performed, overstretching the degree from meeting to exceeding the outcome, or including frequency rather than a description of performance characteristics.
For more detailed information please view the following video:
Ooutcomes-based Assessment Planning Template Tips
As our understanding of OBA deepens, so does our logical integration into course planning. The following planning template was developed to help us better understand and make explicit what the learning is and how it will be measured. Here is a step-by-step guide to the template:
- OUTCOME: Clearly identify an outcome
- VERBS: Consider the verbs (action words) in the outcome and connect them to a level of thinking on Bloom’s hierarchy. If it’s not clearly evident, try looking at this Bloom’s quick check ß link
- CONTENT: What is the content that the outcome requires? Ensure that all parts of the content are expressed in this box.
- STUDENT NEEDS TO: Express what the student will need to do to demonstrate the required learning. Tip: the verb used here should be of a similar Bloom’s level as that of the outcome itself.
- BY… (DOING WHAT?): This should be a summary of skills which considers similar indicators.
- ASSESSMENT TASK(S): What would the student need to do for you to measure their learning? Consider this a piece of summative evidence rather than a smaller, formative, activity.
- KEY SKILLS & KNOWLEDGE: Determine 4-5 key skills which the learner absolutely needs to know to perform the task. Tip: this section will directly influence prioritizing instruction and formative assessment.
- PROFICIENT AT KEY SKILLS/KNOWLEDGE: Clearly articulate the degree to which a student must demonstrate the essential skills and knowledge
For more detailed information, consider viewing the following video:
“How do I engage students in an inclusive, constructive discussion about a controversial issue?”
Discursive strategies guide student interaction with one another as they engage in learning. While some students are more personally impacted by a controversial issues than others, it’s important that all students engage in critical conversations about them, as these problems tend to be systemic. In other words, the pain or injustice at hand / in question is not simply the result of the actions of a small number of unethical people; instead, pain and injustice are somehow built into the status quo of our institutions and dominant systems of thought. This means that all citizens are connected to the problem in some way; it also means that all citizens are empowered to do something about it within their own spheres of influence.
Just as teachers differentiate instructional strategies, they can differentiate discursive strategies to respect students’ needs and thresholds. There are many ways to provide students with options for how they process the issue, including the option of engaging in dialogue with an elder or a trusted peer and the option of journaling privately. These criteria can help to identify fitting strategies for collective inquiry:
All students . . .
1. have voice and express their thinking, ideally multiple times during the lesson.
2. are protected from unwanted exposure and personal attacks.
3. are exposed to, actively consider, and fairly represent multiple points of view.
4. participate in generating new questions which address newly discovered complexities.
5. reflect on the shifts in their thinking which occur as a result of new learning, and the implications of these shifts.
When students are engaging in learning about a controversial issue, the goal is not to solve the issue or reach consensus. Instead, the goal is for students to have the opportunity, through dialogue with others, to deepen their understanding and form their own opinions.
To set students up for success in this kind of learning, it’s important to provide and establish a shared base of knowledge that students can use as a reference point. It’s also important to take time to explain the process they will be using, including its purpose, norms, and expectations.
Discursive Strategy Process
Processes often start and end with individual reflection . The teacher provides or co-constructs with students a prompt, often an essential question, to invite engagement. Then, students move from individual reflection to small group sharing to large group synthesizing and back again to individual reflection. This progression ensures that all students participate in deepening both self-knowledge and shared understandings.
Students respond individually to prompt, recording thinking and experiences in a way that can be shared. (Sticky notes work well!)
Students have the opportunity to see and / or hear the thinking of their peers, identifying points of convergence and divergence –ideas which affirm and unsettle the student’s own thinking.
Students now move into small groups and, using a process, think and reflect on the ideas they chose in Step 2.
Move from small groups to large group, using process or question that invites small groups to share their thinking and questions, identify key issues, consider implications, generate new questions
Return to individual reflection, inviting students to respond to the initial question again in light of new understanding: “How has my thinking shifted? Why? What have I learned about myself, my classmates, this issue? What are the implications of this new learning for me a as a person and citizen?”
Here are links to some strategies that create the conditions described above and follow the process represented here:
Circle of Viewpoints and Step Inside
Debate Team Carousel
The book and website, Making Thinking Visible, contains many processes that can be used in steps 2, 3, and 4.
One of the best ways to prepare students for learning about controversial issues is to embed discursive strategies in their learning every day. This allows them to develop confidence in their own self-expression, trust in their peers, strength in their critical thinking skills, and resilience in their response to complexity. Creating a classroom culture with these attributes brings everyone involved further along on the Cultural Competency Continuum.
If you would like collegial support to include a controversial issue in your instruction, feel free to ask for help, from within your staff or from myself and my colleagues at Central Office.
A group of secondary teachers from across Saskatoon Public Schools has been learning about and applying literacy strategies to enhance subject-specific content learning. Teachers in History, Science, ELA, Math and Phys. Ed have been finding explicit ways to build students’ capacity the 6 skills of disciplinary literacy: accessing prior knowledge, understanding key vocabulary, summarizing main ideas, making inferences, forming connections, and applying metacognition. It’s been a journey of exploration and innovation and through reflection, here are some participant insights:
Are literacy skills key to student success? What works best to strengthen a literacy skill? What doesn’t work, what does?
Although there is no guarantee for student success, disciplinary literacy skills are critical. They are the basic blocks onto which students build other learning, while giving them time to practice and refine their abilities. The focus that disciplinary literacy has on identifying gaps that students have, and addressing them repeatedly over time is important for their growth cycle. Since secondary literacy is as much about thinking in the discipline as reading, when students can collaborate or use a team approach, they have much more freedom to share their voice in smaller groups, to test drive their theories, before risking a large/whole class sharing.
What are teachers’ keys to success? What works best to strengthen a literacy skill? What doesn’t work?
Keys to success
- Identifying the needs for a diverse classroom
- Clarity of focus or purpose
- Know the end goal
- Give students a lens/purpose when approaching a text
- Do not assume that students have the necessary skills when entering our classes
- Affirmation that what you are doing is helping someone
- Identifying which literacy skills are strengths and which literacy skills have gaps
- Being aware of literary strategies
- Explicitly naming them and teaching them to students
What works best to strengthen a literary skill?
- Practicing these skills regularly will strengthen their effectiveness
- Have a plan
- Know how the skill fits in the big plan
- Know that you are the best resource in the room
- Defining a clear role will help students attend more and notice other things on their learning journey
What doesn’t work?
- Using the same strategy for all classes/courses may not be effective (even if it worked for other groups)
- Assuming that learners know how to do each part of a learning task without explicit instruction
In addition to explicitly teaching and practicing literacy skills, what are KEY CHOICES that teachers can make to engage students in learning that improve their thinking and communicating
UNLOCK students’ potential: encourage sharing true thoughts, whether wrong or different, and taking risks.
KEY text/topic: according to interests, getting them engaged and interested
LOCK in the moment, the timing, the method, the way of communicating the ideas, the connections
OPEN THE DOOR with new strategies, activities, differentiated assessments, Adaptive Dimension, feedback
What a teacher needs to successfully address student literacy needs:
- Outside of class time to find resources, discuss with colleagues, plan lessons, assess student skills, etc.
- Within the class and curriculum, to fit in a greater emphasis on literacy than previously
- To complement classroom learning activities
- That are connectable and relatable to your curriculum and units of study
- Ready-to-go lesson plans, worksheets, handouts (in digital form so that they can be adapted)
- A reasonable student to teacher ratio to enable individualized support
- Knowledge of the students and their backgrounds, interests, other classes that they are taking to be able to bring that in to lessons and activities
- Of other teachers’ work for their own practice
- Of student work so show students
- To be able to gauge where particular students are at compared not only to each other but also to curriculum standards
- Subject area colleagues for area-specific support
- School-based colleagues for knowledge of students and school climate
- SLAM colleagues and coordinators/consultants for SLAM and literacy specific knowledge and support
- As a source of ideas
- To see it work in action
- As a source of support
This blog has been co-authored by Secondary Literacy Assessment Matters participants: Katarina Braybrook, Jason Dubray, Doris Duke, Emily Kivol & Jenny Leake, and guided by facilitators Sherry Van Hesteren & Candace Elliott-Jensen.
Outcomes-based assessment has changed how I record grades and assess tasks, and now I’d like to consider outcomes during planning.
As I create new learning activities and assessments, I’ve shifted my thinking from aligning a learning activity with outcomes, to starting with my outcomes and planning how to measure and scaffold instruction towards outcome attainment. Planning with the goal in mind is often referred to as Backward Planning. Authors Wiggins & McTighe detail their own version of Backwards Planning which is called Understanding by Design.
Here are some quick tips to help plan with outcomes in mind:
1. What is your Topic?
Depending on your curricula, you may have a topic, unit, module, theme, etc. Consider the topic as a starting place.
2. Identify Essential Questions
What are the engaging questions which will drive the learning and connect to the Broad Areas of Learning and Cross-curricular Competencies? These should create engagement and curiosity about the learning.
*Follow this link for more information about Essential Questions by experts Wiggins & McTighe
3. Choose 2-3 Outcomes
Look for outcomes which have similarities or that you think will group nicely under one umbrella of learning. Having a manageable number of outcomes ensures that you’re better able to provide targeted instruction, practice, feedback and respond to specific needs. If too many outcomes are identified, there’s a risk of broad practice and feedback which may cause an imprecise understanding of specific outcome performance.
4. Articulate Quality
Go back to the verb in the outcome and to the indicators to establish the level of thinking and/or performance required for each outcome. Now that you understand the requirements of the outcomes, consider and articulate the levels of proficiency for demonstration of learning. This can be done in a variety of ways such as creating or co-creating a rubric, providing examples at various levels or deconstructing an exemplar.
*To learn more about Rubrics and/or articulating proficiency according to Sue Brookhart click here.
5. Select Differentiated Tasks
Choice for students allows them to demonstrate knowledge in the manner they feel most comfortable; this enhances engagement and the likelihood for achievement. Remember that differentiation isn’t about changing a standard and that differentiated tasks should consider similar rigor and levels of thinking.
*See what differentiation expert Carol Ann Tomlinson says about differentiated instruction here.
6. Scaffold for Instruction
What skills do students need to demonstrate outcome attainment and which instructional strategies will be the most effective learning tools? Consider learning materials, feedback cycles along with opportunities to respond by re-teaching or additional practice.
And there you have it — a plan which starts with outcomes in mind and works backward to ensure the learning and measurement targets outcomes.
This is a condensed guide which identifies a few considerations for backwards outcomes-based planning. If you’re interested in learning more, check out the following resources
Understanding By Design by McTighe & Wiggins
Essential Questions: Opening Doors to Student Understanding by McTighe & Wiggins
The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners by Carol Ann Tomlinson
For educators, sometimes controversial issues seem like danger zones. We know they’re important, in our lives and curricula, but aren’t sure if, when, and how to address them with our students. What do we need to know and do to turn potential danger zones into ethical spaces, for ourselves and our students?
What are the main sources of controversial issues?
Social justice issues exist because power and privilege are not yet equitably distributed among people(s) in our communities, province, country, and world; facets of individual and group identity like race, sex, religion, gender identity, and place of origin continue to privilege some and marginalize others.
There are a few sources of controversial issues for teachers and students. The first is the curriculum itself. Many curricula contain outcomes which connect to controversial issues and the skills required to navigate them. The second is the world around us. Current events are full of them, and some hit very close to home. The third is the life of the community in our classroom and school: incidents occur and trends develop which students need to make sense of and engage with as citizens in their own right.
What is the connection between “Controversial Issues” and “Courageous Conversations”?
Controversial issues involve multiple and diverse worldviews. Treating controversial issues as subjects of inquiry demands courage, the courage to:
1. Make one’s own assumptions and thinking visible and vulnerable to scrutiny, by ourselves and others.
2. Expose oneself to ideas we may find objectionable and/or threatening.
3. Shift one’s thinking in response to new knowledge and principles.
4. Form commitments to act, commitments which require personal change
Often, we can feel the current of energy pass through every body in the room when someone in it makes a claim that endorses or challenges an inequity. How can we, as educators, respond, both in the moment and in premeditated ways, to optimize student learning and growth while minimizing harms when controversial issues are at hand?
What are the main stances toward controversial issues in the classroom?
There tend to be four educator stances toward Courageous Conversations:
Stance 1: Avoidant; reactive, unprepared
“I hope nothing triggers one and, if one arises, I don’t know what I’ll do.”
Stance 2: Avoidant, reactive, survival strategy
“I hope nothing triggers one, but I have a way of acknowledging and responding to it if it does.”
Stance 3: Open, reactive, unstructured response
“I welcome these triggers, and have a couple of ways of responding if they do.”
Stance 4: Open, proactive, intentional strategies
“These conversations are necessary; I plan for them and use strategies that strengthen students’ citizenship competencies.”
What does the most helpful stance look like?
Engaging in complex issues constructively requires deliberate strategies to ensure student voice, emotional safety, and fairmindedness. So, Stance 4 is optimal! What does it look like in practice? Let’s take the attributes of a destructive conversation about a controversial issue and then reverse them, and see what happens:
1. Only a few people speak.
2. Speakers and their ideas polarize quickly, sharply.
3. Listeners feel anxious.
4. Relationships are at risk.
5. When it’s done, it’s unlikely that anyone’s thinking has shifted significantly.
Okay, in reverse:
1. Everyone has a voice.
2. The range of ideas and perspectives is broad and deep.
3. Participants feel safe.
4. Relationships strengthen.
5. When it’s done, it’s likely that many people’s thinking has shifted significantly.
When addressing a controversial issue with students, it’s important to plan how you will talk about and explore it. Simply “having a discussion” is problematic. In the classroom, when a controversial issue is at hand, giving free reign to unexamined habits of thought and interaction tends to reinforce existing thinking and power dynamics in a group, not alter them. Interrupting these habits with discursive strategies that meet the criteria in the second list is the key. They create an opportunity for teachers and students to develop their cross-cultural competencies, as “a variety of perspectives and worldviews are presented and equally valued” and the teacher and students together “explore issues of equity and social injustices within a spirit of inquiry” (SPS Cross-Cultural Competence Continuum)
What are the benefits of intentionally including controversial issues in teaching and learning?
There is remarkable diversity in every classroom. Each student’s identity lives at the intersection of various phenomenon: age, language, race, nationality, gender, physical ability, social class — to name a few. As controversial issues are invariably about identity, in some way or another, they reflect and affect students directly. When we make room for these issues in our pedagogy, courses, and classroom culture, we affirm students’ identities and honor their need for voice, connection, and agency – both individually and collectively. Ironically, turning toward issues which may seem dangerous can, in fact, increase students’ perception and experience of cultural safety in our classrooms and schools. This, is turn, can result in a cascade of benefits.
See related blogs on Discursive Strategies and Essential Citizenship Competencies to learn more.
As teachers, there are three key times in the sequence of a lesson when we have the opportunity to support a student who may be struggling with what we are teaching:
- While we are instructing (last post)
- While students are practicing (this post)
- After practice, to ensure students are making sense of the learning for themselves, so they’ll remember it (post 3 of 3)
When students practice something, they are more likely to understand it and retrieve it later, but only if that practice is effective. As teachers we need to provide the right amount of practice, with support, focused on the most important skills and understandings so the learning can transfer to new situations. For students who are struggling to learn something, each of elements of effective practice can be treacherous, so teachers need to think about them carefully.
|What||Who will this help the most?||Why it helps|
|Reduce number of repetitions and/or questions or give more time
|Students who take a long time to complete something they are visibly working to complete.||When students think more slowly (processing speed) or have reduced thinking capacity (cognitive ability), doing many examples does not help with understanding, because it is not in the zone of proximal development. Fewer examples or questions makes the task possible.|
|Work together with peers to think aloud through problems||Students who are disengaged or confused.||Practicing problems together meets adolescent needs for belonging and helps them see the thinking of others. Students also hear additional explanations and thinking to sharpen their own|
|Ask questions that require judgement and creation, not just recall||Students who are disengaged, or who think the learning is stupid or pointless.
Students who can’t remember what they learned before.
|Over 80% of recall learning from a class is immediately forgotten within three months. Higher level thinking cements concepts in the brain that make it much easier to retrieve factual information needed for the judgement or creation. Also, students are much more likely to rate task with higher level learning as relevant, and studies show they pay much closer attention to it.|
More about making practice effective for students:
Two-Eyed Seeing is a Mi’kmaw concept brought forward by Elder Albert Marshall. Etuaptmumk, as it is understood in Mi’kmaw,
“refers to learning to see from one eye with the strengths of Indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing, and from the other eye with the strengths of Western knowledges and ways of knowing … and learning to use both these eyes together, for the benefit of all”.
This approach to the world is not entirely new, or limited to Indigenous culture, but it is timely and relevant. Integrative, transdisciplinary, or culturally collaborative work has been going on for years and we are fortunate to be living in a society that is beginning to see the value. In particular, the concept of Two-Eyed-Seeing has been adopted in Education, Health and private industry and gains momentum every day, not as a fad, but as a legitimate basis for human enterprise.
A lifetime ago, before beginning my own journey within education, I read “Wisdom of the Elders”. Written by Peter Knudson and David Suzuki, this book approaches Indigenous knowledge and Western Scientific Knowledge as equally valid interpretations of the natural world. This was the first time I saw Indigenous knowledge treated as valid and valuable and I immediately understood the implication for society.
The perspectives are vastly different, highly necessary, and only those that are comfortable with both can move us forward.
Etuaptmumk is not totally unfamiliar to educators, we are consistently required to view our work from the perspectives of parents, students, and society. Communicating about curriculum and pedagogy with parents can be effortless when it is done with the motivations and strengths of the family in mind. In the same way, a substantial relationship with students allows us to more easily guide the learning. Finally, understanding the way in which school culture impacts and is impacted by the larger society allows us to make learning relevant for students.
Indigenous students are also very familiar with the concept. Often described as walking in two worlds or on two paths they learn to balance extremely different ideologies and value systems while finding a space to create a self that can flourish in both. By recognizing the value of this skill, we can support them in developing it further and ultimately support the creation of powerful members of society.
Métis throughout history have helped to bridge understanding between Indigenous and Western European approaches to our world, and perhaps this is why I feel compelled to continue the work. But the bottom line is that Etuapmumk is the path forward. As with eyes, we each have a dominant side, a default position. But also as with eyes, the creator designed us in most cases to have two, so that our view can be broader, more inclusive and more importantly, a truer representation of the world around us. As educators in Saskatchewan it is our responsibility to strengthen our understanding of the Indigenous cultures with whom we share this space. As we learn and grow our two-eyed seeing will develop and provide us with a more developed and accurate way to describe and interpret the world around us.